Changes in the behaviour of health-care workers (HCWs) are required to improve adherence to infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines. Despite heavy investment in strategies to change behaviour, effectiveness has not been adequately assessed. We did a systematic review to assess the effectiveness and sustainability of interventions to change IPC behaviour and assessed exploratory literature for barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change. 21 studies published from 1999 to 2011 met our inclusion criteria: seven intervention studies and 14 exploratory studies.
Go to Source
Similar Products: Powered by 
 |
Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews :: Amazon Healthcare decision makers in search of reliable information that compares health interventions increasingly turn to systematic reviews for |
Related posts:
- HIV infection and sexual risk behaviour among youth who have experienced orphanhood: systematic review and meta-analysis
- The Value of Educational Messages Embedded in a Community-Based Approach to Combat Dengue Fever: A Systematic Review and Meta Regression Analysis
- The architecture and effect of participation: a systematic review of community participation for communicable disease control and elimination. Implications for malaria elimination
- What zinc supplementation does and does not achieve in diarrhea prevention: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Linking sexual and reproductive health and HIV interventions: a systematic review
